State v. Bellamy

CourtListener 10154007Scctapp18 mag 2011

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Travis Bellamy, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-221

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed May 18, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Travis Bellamy appeals his convictions for first degree burglary and armed robbery, arguing the trial court erred in giving an
unconstitutionally coercive Allen instruction.  Additionally, Bellamy asserts numerous pro se arguments.  After a thorough review of the record
and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.