State v. Hall

CourtListener 10153987Scctapp24 mag 2011

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tarrence Derrel
Hall, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-250 

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed May 24, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, of Greenville,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tarrence
Derrel Hall appeals his convictions for resisting arrest with a deadly weapon,
failing to stop for a blue light, possessing marijuana, and operating a vehicle
without a driver's license.  He argues the circuit court erred in denying his
motion for a new trial.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., CURETON and
GOOLSBY A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.