State v. Blakeney

CourtListener 10153854Scctapp2 feb 2011

Testo completo

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Lisa Ann Blakeney, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-043

Submitted January 1, 2011 – Filed February
2, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John
W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Lisa Ann Blakeney appeals her convictions for
possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, assault and battery of a
high and aggravated nature, and failure to stop for a blue light.  On appeal, Blakeney
argues the trial court's jury charge on reasonable doubt was erroneous and
confused the jury, and it lessened the State's burden of proof.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief,
and Blakeney's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF and LOCKEMY, JJ., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.