CCDSS v. Synora C.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Charleston
County Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Synora C.,
Nathaniel L., Tyrone R., Anthony W., and John  Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Nathaniel
L. is the Appellant.

In
the interest of one minor child.

Appeal From Charleston County

Jocelyn B. Cate, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-566

Submitted December 1, 2010 – Filed
December 23, 2010   

AFFIRMED

Ellen Howard Bentz, of Charleston, for
Appellant.

Bonnie T. Brisbane, of North Charleston,
for Respondent.

Jennifer Ann Jordan, of Charleston, Guardian
ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Nathaniel L.appeals from the family court's order terminating his
parental rights to his minor child.  See S.C.
Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.  

AFFIRMED.[1]

FEW, C.J.,
HUFF, J., and LOCKEMY, J, concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.