SCDSS c. Letha S.

CourtListener 10153722Scctapp4 nov 2010

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

   v.

Letha S.,
Joseph G., Roger G., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Letha S.
and Roger G. are the Appellants.

In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Lancaster County

Brian M. Gibbons, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-486

Submitted May 3, 2010 – Filed November 4,
2010

AFFIRMED

Sally A. Carver-Young, of Rock Hill, for
Appellant Letha S.

David C. Cook, of Lancaster, for Appellant
Roger G.

Angela Killian, of Lancaster, for
Respondent.

Irma Brooks, of Sumter, Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Letha S. (Mother) and Roger G. (Father)
both appeal from the family court's final
order terminating their parental rights to their minor children.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a
thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and
conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS and
KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.     

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.