Shepherd v. State

CourtListener 10153639Scctapp13 set 2010

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Glenn Shepherd, Appellant,

v.

The State of South
Carolina, Respondent.

Appeal From Greenwood County

J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-399

Filed January 4, 2010 – Filed September
13, 2010  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Lena Younts Meredith, of Greenwood, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Ashley Anne
McMahan, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Glenn Shepherd appeals the dismissal of
his petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging the circuit court erred in
dismissing his petition because trial counsel's ineffective assistance denied
him fundamental fairness shocking to the universal sense of justice.  After a thorough
review of the record, counsel's brief, and Shepherd's pro se brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.