State v. Stancil

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Bryan
Stancil, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

 J.C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-305

Submitted June 1, 2010 – Filed June 10,
2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James
Bryan Stancil appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred
in revoking his probation in full.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.