State v. Boyd

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Netha Jay Boyd, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

James R. Barber III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-223

Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed March 29,
2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Netha
Jay Boyd appeals her probation revocation, arguing the revocation hearing was
so summary that her revocation should be reversed.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.