State v. Phillip Sherman

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Phillip Hollis Sherman, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-088

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
3, 2010   

Affirmed

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Phillip
Sherman appeals from his conviction for failure to stop for a blue light.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR,
and the following authorities:  State
v. Simpson, 325 S.C. 37, 42, 479 S.E.2d 57, 60 (1996) (holding a ruling in
limine is not a final ruling on the admissibility of evidence, and unless
an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling is
made, the issue is not preserved for review);  State v. Benton, 338 S.C.
151, 156-57, 526 S.E.2d 228, 231 (2000) (stating an issue is not preserved for
appeal when the issue is conceded at trial); State v. Avery, 333 S.C.
284, 296, 509 S.E.2d 476, 483 (1998) (holding that when an appellant fails to
object to a jury charge, the issue is not preserved for appeal).

Affirmed.

SHORT, THOMAS, and
KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.