CourtListener 10153339•State v. Ronnie Middleton
Testo completo
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Ronnie
Middleton, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-113
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February
8, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Acting Chief Appellate Defender Robert M.
Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of
Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Ronnie
Middleton appeals his kidnapping conviction and corresponding life without
parole sentence. Middleton argues the trial court erred in refusing to grant a
directed verdict on the charge of kidnapping. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.