State v. Isaiah Walker

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Isaiah Walker, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-114

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
11, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Rodney Wade Richey, of Greenville, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold Gowdy, III of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Isaiah Frederick Walker appeals his conviction and sentence for murder, arguing
the trial court erred in declining to direct a verdict in his favor because the
State presented no direct evidence of his guilt.  After thoroughly reviewing
the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] Walker's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Williams, Pieper,
and Lockemy, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.