State v. Andrew Osimbo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Andrew Meshach Osimbo, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-129

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
17, 2010  

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliot, Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport and Solicitor
Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Andrew Meshach Osimbo appeals his guilty pleas to lewd act upon a child and
assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct in the second degree.
Specifically, he maintains his guilty pleas failed to conform with the mandates
set forth in Boykin v. Alabama because the plea judge failed to
adequately inform him of the constitutional rights he waived by entering a
guilty plea. 395 U.S. 238 (1969). We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and State v. McKinney, 278 S.C. 107,
108, 292 S.E.2d 598, 599 (1982) (holding absent timely objection at plea
proceeding, unknowing and involuntary nature of guilty plea can be attacked
 

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.