State v. Demareo Mack

CourtListener 10153322Scctapp17 feb 2010

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Demareo Vadale Mack, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-134

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
17, 2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Donald J. Zelenka, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; Solicitor Harold
W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Demareo Vadale Mack appeals his guilty
plea to first-degree lynching.  On appeal, Mack alleges the plea did not meet the mandates of Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Mack's appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.