State v. Paul Reid

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Paul F. Reid, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

J. C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-164

Submitted February 1, 2010 – Filed
February 24, 2010  

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A.
Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Julie M. Thames,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Paul
F. Reid appeals his sentences for three counts of first-degree criminal sexual
conduct and one count of kidnapping.  Reid argues the judge abused his
discretion by sentencing Reid to the maximum penalty on each count.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:  State v. Winestock, 271 S.C. 473, 475, 248 S.E.2d 307, 308
(1978) (noting failure to timely object or seek modification of a sentence at
the trial court level precludes a defendant from presenting his objection for
the first time on appeal).  

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.