CourtListener 10153245•State v. Joe Lynch
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Joe Alex Lynch, Appellant.
Appeal From Pickens County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-035
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed January
26, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of
Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Joe Alex Lynch appeals his convictions for second degree criminal
sexual conduct with a minor and lewd act upon a child. Lynch argues the trial
court erred in admitting the victim's out-of-court statement regarding the
details of one of the incidents. After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, A.C.J.,
GEATHERS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.