Alfreda Spann v. Leroy Spann

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Alfreda D. Spann, Respondent,

v.

Leroy Spann, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2022-001635

Appeal From Sumter County
Angela R. Taylor, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-187
Submitted May 8, 2024 – Filed May 22, 2024

AFFIRMED

Stephen Bryan Doby, of Jennings & Jennings, PA, of
Bishopville, for Appellant.

Paul L. Held, of Law Ofc. of Paul L. Held, of Sumter, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Leroy Spann (Husband) appeals from the entry of the final
divorce decree, arguing the family court erred by finding Alfreda D. Spann (Wife)
was entitled to $56,210.00 of special equity interest in Husband's real property
because the finding was without evidentiary support. We affirm pursuant to Rule
220(b), SCACR.
We hold the family court did not err by awarding Wife special equity interest in the
increase in the value of Husband's real property because there was evidence Wife
contributed directly or indirectly to the increase. See Stoney v. Stoney, 422 S.C.
593, 596, 813 S.E.2d 486, 487 (2018) (stating an appellate court reviews the family
court's decisions de novo); S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-630(A)(5) (2014) (providing
any increase in value in nonmarital property is nonmarital property, "except to the
extent that the increase resulted directly or indirectly from efforts of the other
spouse during marriage"); Hagood v. Hagood, 427 S.C. 642, 652, 832 S.E.2d 609,
615 (Ct. App. 2019) ("We recognize the contributions of a spouse to nonmarital
property through the award of a special equity interest in such property.").

AFFIRMED. 1

GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.