Wright v. State

CourtListener 10152942Scctapp10 gen 2024

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Robert Lee Wright, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-002249

Appeal From Charleston County
Kristi Harrington, Trial Judge
Thomas A. Russo, Post-Conviction Relief Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-015
Submitted December 1, 2023 – Filed January 10, 2024

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY
GRANTED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson and Assistant Attorney
General Danielle Dixon, both of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction relief
(PCR) court's denial of Robert Lee Wright's application for PCR. We now dismiss
the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 1

THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., and BROMELL HOLMES, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.