State v. Jonathan Art Lincoln

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jonathan Art Lincoln, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000863

Appeal From Aiken County
Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-393
Submitted October 11, 2022 – Filed October 26, 2022

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and
Jonathan Art Lincoln, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

WILLIAMS, C.J., THOMAS J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.