CourtListener 10152341•SCDSS v. Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman, Brandon Lafredzo
Robinson, and Marquies Lamar Cunningham,
Defendants,
Of whom Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2021-001204
Appeal From Laurens County
Matthew P. Turner, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-201
Submitted May 12, 2022 – Filed May 13, 2022
AFFIRMED
Heather Vry Scalzo, of Byford & Scalzo, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.
Ashley Phillips Case, of Fountain Inn, for Respondent.
Marcus Wesley Meetze, of Law Office of Marcus W.
Meetze, LLC, of Simpsonville, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Ja'Quetrice Tanekka Putman appeals the family court's final
order terminating parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Putnam's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.