Karole Jensen v. Paul Andrew Furr

CourtListener 10152204Scctapp31 mar 2022

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Karole Jensen and Fayrell Furr, Respondents,

v.

Paul Andrew Furr, Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-001461

Appeal From Horry County
Jan B. Bromell Holmes, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-166
Submitted March 25, 2022 – Filed March 31, 2022

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

John O. McDougall, of McDougall, Self, Currence &
McLeod, LLP, of Columbia; and Deborah B. Dantzler, of
Conway, both for Respondents.

Melanie Carol Nicholson, of Law Office of Melanie C.
Nicholson, of North Myrtle Beach, as Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Paul Andrew Furr appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child and granting the child's adoption.
See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the
record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex
parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Furr's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.