SCDSS v. Dunster

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Cherod Johnson and Cidney Dunster, Defendants,

Of whom Cidney Dunster is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000220

Appeal From Darlington County
Cely Anne Brigman, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-355
Submitted October 7, 2021 – Filed October 12, 2021

AFFIRMED

Sarah Crawford Campbell, of Campbell Law, LLC, of
Chesterfield, for Appellant.

Christopher Craig Jackson, of Chris Jackson Law Firm
LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent.
Stuart Wesley Snow, Jr., of Snow & Bailey Law Firm,
P.A., of Florence, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Cidney Dunster appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Dunster's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.