CourtListener 10151818•SCDSS v. Sweatt
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Trisha Christina Sweatt and Anthony Michael Henle,
Defendants,
v.
Ralph and Kelly George, Intervenors,
Of whom Trisha Christina Sweatt is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2020-001004
Appeal From York County
Jessica Ann Salvini, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-187
Submitted April 23, 2021 – Filed May 24, 2021
AFFIRMED
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Christopher Craig Jackson, of Chris Jackson Law Firm
LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondents.
Rebecca T. McNerney, of Waxhaw, North Carolina, for
the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Trisha Christina Sweatt appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Sweatt's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.