CourtListener 10151815•SCDSS v. Slade
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Lakesha C. Slade and William Roseboro, Defendants,
Of whom Lakesha C. Slade is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2020-001330
Appeal From York County
David G. Guyton, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-114
Submitted March 18, 2021 – Filed April 6, 2021
AFFIRMED
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Kathryn J. Walsh, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Rock Hill; and Andrew Troy Potter,
of Anderson, for Respondent.
Donae Alecia Minor, of Minor Law Offices LLC, of Fort
Mill; and Rebecca T. McNerney, of Waxhaw, North
Carolina, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Lakesha C. Slade appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Slade's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.