SCDSS v. McCue

CourtListener 10151730Scctapp3 feb 2021

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey T. McCue and Radina A. Franks, Defendants,

Of whom Jeffrey T. McCue is the Appellant

and

Radina A. Franks is a Respondent.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-000958

Appeal From Charleston County
Alice Anne Richter, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-033
Submitted February 2, 2021 – Filed February 3, 2021

AFFIRMED

Heather Vry Scalzo, of Byford & Scalzo, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.
Christopher L. Murphy, of Murphy Law Offices, of
Charleston, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.

Sally R. Young, of South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of North Charleston, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.

Tina W. Dixon, of North Charleston, for Respondent
Radina A. Franks.

Alwyn Taylor Silver, of Silver Law Firm, LLC, of
Georgetown, as Guardian ad Litem for the minor child.

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey T. McCue appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve McCue's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.