CourtListener 10151677•State v. Morris
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Christopher Neal Morris, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000853
Appeal From Aiken County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-021
Submitted January 1, 2021 – Filed January 27, 2021
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
THOMAS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.