SCDSS v.Session

CourtListener 10151663Scctapp4 dic 2020

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Amanda Marie Smith Session, Randi Lee Session, and
Allen Session, Defendants,

Of whom Randi Lee Session is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-001001

Appeal From Horry County
Ronald R. Norton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-331
Submitted November 17, 2020 – Filed December 4, 2020

AFFIRMED

Heather Vry Scalzo, of Byford & Scalzo, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.

Ernest Joseph Jarrett, of Jenkinson Jarrett & Kellahan,
PA, of Kingstree, for Respondent.
Michael Julius Schwartz, of Russell B. Long, PA, and
Heather Marie Moore, of Axelrod & Associates, PA,
both of Myrtle Beach, for the Guardians ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Randi Lee Session appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Session's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.