SCDSS v. Edwards

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Misty Dawn Bramlett Edwards and Chad Ledford
Edwards, Appellants.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001082

Appeal From Oconee County
Tommy B. Edwards, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-318
Submitted November 17, 2020 – Filed November 20, 2020

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellants.

Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.

Steven Luther Alexander, of Alexander Law Firm, LLC,
of Pickens, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Misty Dawn Bramlett Edwards and Chad Ledford Edwards
appeal the family court's final order terminating their parental rights to their minor
children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review
of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law
pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no
meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's
ruling and relieve the Edwards' counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.