SCDSS v. Redd

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Stephanie Franks and Kyle Redd, Defendants,

Of whom Kyle Redd is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2019-002116

Appeal From Aiken County
John M. Rucker, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-228
Submitted July 24, 2020 – Filed July 28, 2020

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Amanda Mange Scott, of Ken Allen Attorney, of White
Rock; Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville; and Susanna M.
Ringler, of South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of Aiken, all for Respondent.
Jessica Brilhante, of Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Kyle Redd appeals the family court's final order terminating his
parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019).
Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and
conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381
(1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the
family court's ruling and relieve Redd's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.