CourtListener 10151259•SCDSS v. Griffin
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Danielle Griffin, Robert Holmes, and John Doe,
Defendants,
Of whom Danielle Griffin is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000805
Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-376
Submitted November 8, 2019 – Filed December 4, 2019
AFFIRMED
Dustin Christian Davis, of Dustin C. Davis Attorney at
Law, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem for
Appellant.
Amanda B. Stiles, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Danielle Griffin appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2019). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Griffin's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.