State v. Arthur

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Lamont Arthur, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002595

Appeal From Horry County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-364
Submitted October 1, 2019 – Filed November 13, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia; and James Lamont Arthur, pro se.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.