SCDSS v. Fincher

CourtListener 10151156Scctapp25 set 2019

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Stacy M. Fincher, Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-002191

Appeal From York County
David G. Guyton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-321
Submitted August 23, 2019 – Filed September 25, 2019

AFFIRMED

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.

David E. Simpson, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Rock Hill, for Respondent.

Rebecca T. McNerney, of Charlotte, N.C., for the
Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Stacy Fincher appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Fincher's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.