CourtListener 10151007•SCDSS v. Long
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Desiray Marie Bratton and Ty Clavon Long, Defendants,
Of whom Ty Clavon Long is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2018-002000
Appeal From Horry County
A. E. Morehead, III, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-180
Submitted May 15, 2019 – Filed May 21, 2019
AFFIRMED
Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.
Charles Richard Rhodes, Jr., of Charles R. Rhodes Jr.,
PC, of Conway, for Respondent.
Ryan A. Stampfle, of Indigo Family Law, LLC, of
Surfside Beach, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Ty Clavon Long appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Long's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
HUFF, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.