SCDSS v. Hendrix

CourtListener 10151002Scctapp24 mag 2019

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Mary Beasley, Derrick Fleming, Zikomo Hendrix, and
Diane Mack, Defendants,

Of whom Zikomo Hendrix is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001632

Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-194
Submitted May 6, 2019 – Filed May 24, 2019

AFFIRMED

Matthew P. Head, of Head Law Firm, LLC, of
Greenville, for Appellant.

Richard Whitney Allen, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Don J. Stevenson, of Don J. Stevenson, Attorney at Law,
of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Zikomo Hendrix appeals a family court order finding he harmed
two minor children, removing them from his custody, and ordering him to
complete a placement plan. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-1660 (2010 & Supp.
2018). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hendrix's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and SHORT and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.