In the Matter of Wake Hunt

CourtListener 10150751Scctapp31 ott 2018

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Wake Hunt,
Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-000585

Appeal From Orangeburg County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-398
Submitted October 1, 2018 – Filed October 31, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004). Counsel's
motion to be relieved is granted.1

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.