SCDSS v. Gersh

CourtListener 10150741Scctapp10 set 2018

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Katy Gersh and Joseph Goodrich, Defendants,

Of whom Katy Gersh is the Appellant

and

Of whom Joseph Goodrich is a Respondent.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2018-000383

Appeal From Dorchester County
Anne Gue Jones, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-367
Submitted August 29, 2018 – Filed September 10, 2018

AFFIRMED

Mary Patricia Crawford, of Walterboro, for Appellant.
Brent Biagio Greenberg, of Greenberg Law Firm, LLC,
of Charleston, for Respondent Joseph Goodrich.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.

Mary Lee Briggs, of Charleston, for the Guardian ad
Litem.

PER CURIAM: Katy Gersh appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Gersh's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.