SCDSS v. Hitt

CourtListener 10150716Scctapp30 ago 2018

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Sheena Savannah Ann Spoon and Earl Wayne Hitt,
Defendants,

Of whom Earl Wayne Hitt is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002484

Appeal From Pickens County
Thomas T. Hodges, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-362
Submitted August 20, 2018 – Filed August 30, 2018

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, of The
Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Julie Mahon Rau, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Pickens, for Respondent.
Steven Luther Alexander, of Alexander Law Firm, LLC,
of Pickens, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Earl Wayne Hitt appeals from the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hitt's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.