Strand Classics v. Emiliano

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Strand Classics Restorations, Appellant,

v.

Frank Emiliano, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001409

Appeal From Georgetown County
Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-171
Submitted March 1, 2018 – Filed May 2, 2018

AFFIRMED

Raymond Carl Fischer and William Stuart Duncan, of
Georgetown, for Appellant.

Frank Emiliano, of Coral Springs, Florida, pro se.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authority: Indigo Assocs. v. Ryan Inv. Co., 314 S.C. 519, 523, 431 S.E.2d 271, 273
(Ct. App. 1993) ("The circuit court, acting as an appellate court in a case heard by
the magistrate, cannot consider questions that have not been presented to the
magistrate.").
AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.