State v. Hughes

CourtListener 10150454Scctapp7 feb 2018

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jarvis Tyronne Hughes, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001462

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-056
Submitted January 1, 2018 – Filed February 7, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia;
and Jarvis Tyronne Hughes, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.