CourtListener 10150407•SCDSS v. Gissendanner
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Shelbey Darlene Gissendanner, Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2017-000178
Appeal From Richland County
Monét S. Pincus, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-032
Submitted December 20, 2017 – Filed January 16, 2018
AFFIRMED
John Clark Phillips, Jr., of Law Office of John C.
Phillips, Jr., of Columbia, for Appellant.
Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Angela L. Kohel, of Richland County CASA, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Shelbey Darlene Gissendanner appeals the family court's final
order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 6372570 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Gissendanner's Counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
SHORT, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.