State v. Young

CourtListener 10150143Scctapp28 giu 2017

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Cleveland Edward Young, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000770

Appeal From Union County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-255
Submitted June 1, 2017 – Filed June 28, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and
Cleveland Edward Young, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted. 1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GEATHERS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.