State v. Peterson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Christopher Mayhue Peterson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-001359

Appeal From Florence County
William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-107
Submitted January 1, 2017 – Filed March 8, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia,
and Christopher Mayhue Peterson, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.