State v. Hakeem

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jamal Hakeem, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2015-001542

Appeal From Greenwood County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-075
Submitted December 1, 2016 – Filed February 8, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Jamal Hakeem, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Matthew Stumbo,
of Greenwood, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.