CourtListener 10149970•SCDSS v. Suber
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Kietra O. Johnson and James A. Suber, Jr. III,
Defendants,
Of whom James A. Suber, Jr. III is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2016-001428
Appeal From Richland County
Coreen B. Khoury, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-093
Submitted February 27, 2017 – Filed February 23, 2017
AFFIRMED
Benjamin Reynolds Elliott, of Stevens B. Elliott,
Attorney At Law, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Anne Marie Ugarte, of University of South Carolina
School of Law, of Columbia, for Respondent.
Angela L. Kohel, of Richland County CASA, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: James A. Suber, Jr. III appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2016). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Suber's
counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.