SCDSS v. Laws

CourtListener 10149754Scctapp12 set 2016

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Sharon Laws and James Carroll, Defendants,

Of whom Sharon Laws is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000763

Appeal From Lexington County
Michelle M. Hurley, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-410
Submitted August 16, 2016 – Filed September 12, 2016

AFFIRMED

Anna Rawl Good, of Law Office of Anna Good, LLC, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Jordan Phillip Gibson, of West Columbia, for
Respondent.
Robin Page, of Law Office of Robin Page, LLC, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Sharon Laws appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2015). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Laws' counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.