State v. McCrorey

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Teramine Lamont McCrorey, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002192

Appeal From York County
J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-538
Submitted October 1, 2015 – Filed November 25, 2015

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Jennifer Ellis Roberts, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Dicapua, 373 S.C. 452, 455, 646 S.E.2d 150, 152 (Ct. App.
2007) (holding the defendant's statement that he had no objection to the admission
of certain evidence "amounted to a waiver of any issue [he] had with the
[evidence]"), aff'd, 383 S.C. 394, 680 S.E.2d 292 (2009); id. at 456, 646 S.E.2d at
152 (holding a party's "express waiver of objection to the admission of" evidence is
"tantamount to a withdrawal of [that party's] previous motion to suppress" (quoting
Martelly v. State, 187 A.2d 105, 108 (Md. 1963))).

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.