State v. Dixon

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Eric Dixon, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002386

Appeal From Marlboro County
J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-385
Submitted June 1, 2015 – Filed July 29, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and
David Eric Dixon, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, LOCKEMY, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.