CourtListener 10149024•SCDSS v. Wooten
Testo completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Latasha Martin Lee and William David Wooten,
Defendants,
Of whom William David Wooten is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002403
Appeal From Greenville County
Tarita A. Dunbar, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-246
Submitted April 7, 2015 – Filed May 4, 2015
AFFIRMED
R. Mills Ariail, Jr., of Law Office of R. Mills Ariail, Jr.,
of Greenville, for Appellant.
Jonathan Ashley Neal, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Robert John Stephenson, IV, of Robert J. Stephenson,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: William David Wooten appeals the family court's order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Wooten's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1
SHORT, LOCKEMY, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.