SCDSS v. Tucker

CourtListener 10148997Scctapp8 mag 2015

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Jamielynn Adale Beneduce Tucker and Marc Robert
LeDuc, Sr., Defendants,

Of whom Jamielynn Adale Beneduce Tucker is the
Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002299

Appeal From Horry County
Ronald R. Norton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-255
Submitted April 27, 2015 – Filed May 8, 2015

AFFIRMED

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.
Ernest Joseph Jarrett, of Jenkinson Jarrett & Kellahan,
PA, of Kingstree, for Respondent.

Ian Andrew Taylor, of Taylor Law Office, of Pawleys
Island, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Jamielynn Adale Beneduce Tucker appeals the family court's
final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code
Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Tucker's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.