L&M v. Yearick

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

L&M, LLC, Appellant,

v.

Robert W. Yearick, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001361

Appeal From Charleston County
J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-250
Heard April 16, 2015 – Filed May 13, 2015

AFFIRMED

William Scotty Sheriff, of Sheriff Law Firm, of
Charleston, for Appellant.

Robert C. Wilson, Jr., of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: L&M, LLC, appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment
to Robert Yearick on its mechanic's lien dissolution action. We affirm pursuant to
Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330
S.C. 71, 76, 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) (stating that an issue cannot be raised for
the first time on appeal); Doe v. Roe, 369 S.C. 351, 376, 631 S.E.2d 317, 330 (Ct.
App. 2006) ("An issue is not preserved where the trial court does not explicitly rule
on an argument and the appellant does not make a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or
amend the judgment.").

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.