SCDSS v. Still

CourtListener 10148963Scctapp6 apr 2015

Testo completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Kami Augustine a/k/a Kami Nicole Driggers and Devin
Alexander Still, Defendants.

Of Whom Devin Alexander Still is the Appellant,

In the interest of two minor children under the age of
eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002552

Appeal From Barnwell County
Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-195
Submitted March 25, 2015 – Filed April 6, 2015

AFFIRMED

Lindsay Yoas Goodman, of Horton Law Firm, LLC, of
Bluffton, for Appellant.
Amanda Frances Whittle, of the South Carolina
Department of Social Services, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Devin Alexander Still appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his two minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-
7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Still's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.